Base Hit Investing

Share this post

User's avatar
Base Hit Investing
Apple vs. Exxon Mobil

Apple vs. Exxon Mobil

John Huber's avatar
John Huber
May 16, 2016
∙ Paid

Share this post

User's avatar
Base Hit Investing
Apple vs. Exxon Mobil
Share

I read an article last week by Scott Fearon, who wrote the excellent book Dead Companies Walking (a good book about shorting stocks, which can benefit investors even if they don’t short stocks). The article basically posed a hypothetical question on whether Apple was a better investment than Exxon Mobil. Fearon goes on to explain why he thinks XOM is a better bet than AAPL over the long-term.

His points:

  • Apple is a consumer products company with the majority of revenues coming from one product class—the iPhone

  • Consumer products can be very difficult to predict and can go in and out of demand very quickly

  • Exxon is a more predictable company that sells products that are essential to the world’s economy

  • He implies that Exxon has a stronger balance sheet than Apple

While I often agree with many of Scott’s opinions in his posts, I’ll make just a few counterarguments to his opinion that Exxon is a better business than Apple. I think Apple is a much better business:

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 John Huber
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share